October 28, 2020
The Gaps Right Now
A still from An Insignificant Man which also got into trouble with the
government. Steering committee member of IFFI, Anand Gandhi believes not. "Of
the 153 films selected initially, the jury was to recommend 22 films to the
ministry, which would then select 20 out of those. If not, S Durga and Nude, two
other films would have been dropped and the jury would have a problem with those
then,†shrugs the filmmaker. According to the filmmaker, the best way to improve
the situation would be to create an autonomous body for the festival alone. What
has not changed however is government interference into films.â€
Decades have
passed since then and government measures have changed. If the ministry were to
leave the decisions to them entirely, or at least, largely, then most certainly,
we would have a far better festival than what we have at the moment. Avinash’s
words can perhaps find further validation in the fact that MAMI had a screening
of S Durga in their India Gold section — the same film that the I&B Ministry
has dropped from the IFFI line-up without any explanation. Would we want to risk
looking as though we (the BJP government) is muzzling artistic freedom?†asks
preview board member and BJP politician Vani Tripathi Tikoo rhetorically. "In my
interaction as a member of the steering committee with the ministry, I have seen
a genuine effort on the ministry’s part to try and alleviate the calibre of
discourse and to take small steps towards becoming a truly global film
festival.â€S Durga posterFilmmaker Avinash Das also condemns all government
interference, calling it the principle reason for the stagnation of art and
culture forums. Festival of India (IFFI) by the information and broadcasting
(I&B) ministry, stand testimony to this fact. Just put Mumbai Academy of
Moving China
wholesale Disposable Pillow Cover Image’s (MAMI) Mumbai Film Festival and
IFFI side-by-side.
"The voice of dissent is also an integral part of that
beautiful fabric of India democracy.Back in the 1970s, Satyajit Ray had
complained about the process of getting a government sanctions to send films to
send them to film festivals as "bureaucratic shilly-shallying. And we shall be
hearing a lot of dissenting voices in the films that we’ve chosen for the
panorama this year at IFFI,†she says.Convenor of the Preview Committee for
IFFI, Vivek Agnihotri, however, sheds some light on the matter, claiming that
two films would have been dropped either way. The body could even change the
rules as they are now, so that they could negotiate the decisions taken. "If one
only takes a look at bodies like the Sahitya Akademi, one can see that they’re
autonomous. I would like to have a deeper insight into what is happening and how
best as citizens, as artistes and filmmakers of this country, how best we can
help bridge the gaps right now that exist,†he signs off.Anand also admits that
the matter is not as black and white as it seems.With the upheavals around the
festival showing no signs of abating, one wonders whether government intrusion
at an international film festival is desirable at all.
Posted by: nabriskacebr at
01:45 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 525 words, total size 3 kb.
12kb generated in CPU 0.0057, elapsed 0.0284 seconds.
34 queries taking 0.0243 seconds, 50 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
34 queries taking 0.0243 seconds, 50 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.